Skip to main content

The most expensive movie flops in history

The Adventures of Pluto Nash (2002)

It might be hard to imagine now, but there was a time when Eddie Murphy's presence in a movie was basically a cheat code to box office success. The man made Trading Places, Coming to America, and even The Nutty Professora success, and his stand-up movies were also incredibly popular. Those days were over long before The Adventures of Pluto Nash arrived. Still, the high concept sounded great—"Eddie Murphy as Han Solo" could have been a slam dunk. The movie just didn't connect with audiences, however, earning back only $7.1 million of its reported $100 million budget.
It's not hard to see why the film fared so poorly. It's (to put it mildly) a complete mess for everyone involved—mediocre special effects, a confusing and unfunny script, and a nonsensical future setting. Hoping that a science-fiction comedy could be successfully anchored purely on Eddie Murphy's ability to attract a crowd was a big gamble, and ultimately that $100 million budget was too much to wager.

Stealth (2005)

You might not recognize Rob Cohen by name, but you almost certainly remember his movies—or their star, Vin Diesel. Cohen directed both The Fast and the Furious and XXX, which makes him at least partly responsible for the Vin Diesel era we're currently living in. That couldn't save him, however, when Stealth flopped, potentially spelling the end of Cohen's major movie career.
The movie follows a group of trained Air Force pilots as they try to take down a corrupted AI-controlled jet, and reads more like a science-fiction parody of Top Gun than the guileless, masculine-driven tone of Cohen's more successful movies. It grossed $76 million, but the price tag of $135 million meant it needed to bring in a lot more than that. Maybe with Diesel on board it might have fared better; as it is, Stealth seems to have snuck by moviegoers.

Sahara (2005)

Sahara looked like an attempt at recapturing the magic of Indiana Jones, but it was really an adaptation of a massively successful series of books that's also about a rugged adventurer with a quick wit and a way with women. Unfortunately for everyone involved, the built-in audience for the books didn't translate to a box office success: Sahara grossed a modest $119.3 million that wasn't enough to cover its $160 million budget.
Part of it could have just been poor timing, since the movie starred Matthew McConaughey just a few years before his star power returned in full force. Weirdly, the most surprising fact about Sahara isn't its poor box office, but rather that the writer of the series, Clive Cussler, sued the production company of the movie after the film's failure to live up to his expectations. Even the courts couldn't ultimately decide who should be legally to blame for Sahara's box office failure.

Jack the Giant Slayer (2013)

CGI-animated adaptations of children's stories have never exactly been favorite for most audiences, and Jack the Giant Slayer ended up being no different. Revisiting a fairy tale most viewers knew by heart was a risk to begin with, and director Bryan Singer's movie only scored $65 million at the domestic box office, against a $195 million budget. (It would eventually break even thanks to international returns.)
The movie's underwhelming performance at home means it's generally thought of as a box office failure—when people even think of it at all. Some critics have argued that its failure stems from an inability to combine the mature content of Singer's past films with the studio's desire to make a family-friendly franchise, but either way, the movie's budget was one giant Jack couldn't slay.

R.I.P.D. (2013)

R.I.P.D. has one of the easiest high concept pitches you can imagine. In the world of the afterlife, there's a specialized police force called the R.I.P.D. (Rest In Peace Department) that takes care of renegade spirits before they can affect the human world. It's basically Men in Black with a supernatural twist, and the casting of Ryan Reynolds as the upstart partner to Jeff Bridges' grumpy mentor seemed like a no-brainer. Unfortunately, the movie was pronounced D.O.A., barely making back $78 million of its $130 million budget.
While the failure of certain films can sometimes be attributed to poor marketing, studio interference, or even rival movie releases that are oddly similar, the blame for R.I.P.D.rests pretty entirely on the film itself—it's relentlessly unfunny. For example, there's a running gag about how R.I.P.D. agents are given illusory bodies so regular people can't see them; Reynolds' body looks like an old Chinese man, while Bridges gets a buxom blonde woman as his disguise. It also doesn't help that Bridges and Reynolds seem like they're so bored with the script that they might as well be dead. Maybe they were method acting the whole time?

The Lone Ranger (2013)

The Lone Ranger is a classic part of American pop culture. In the same way that you don't need to be a fan of Superman to know that he stands for "Truth, Justice, and the American Way," The Lone Ranger's catchphrase of "Hi-ho, Silver, away!" has become ingrained in the lexicon. Unfortunately for the makers of 2013's The Lone Ranger, that didn't make much of a difference at the box office, where the film barely made $89 million domestic against its $215 million budget. It eventually recouped another $171 million worldwide, but that didn't make it any less of a failure in the United States.
The odds were stacked against The Lone Ranger. The cast includes Johnny Depp (consistently one of Hollywood's most overpaid actors for years) and the relatively unproven Armie Hammer. The movie's efforts to depict Native American sidekick Tonto in a less-offensive way than past adaptations proved even more difficult when the production came under fire for whitewashing the character by casting Depp. Finally, the movie's budget was astronomical—marketing expenses aren't even usually factored into reported budgets, meaning the movie could have cost more than $300 million in all.

John Carter (2012)

Speaking of classic early 20th-century characters adapted for the big screen, here's John Carter, the adaptation of the seminal works of Edgar Rice Burroughs' Barsoom stories. Unlike The Lone Ranger, the issue of adapting John Carter novels isn't one of recognizability—it's the problem of a piece of work so influential that it looks like it's copying stories that were created decades later. Burroughs' work has influenced everything from Star Wars and Star Trek to parts of the DC Universe, but that didn't make the movie adaptation look any less derivative.
John Carter managed to make $73 million domestically, but it was a drop in the bucket for its $250 million budget. As is the case with many Hollywood bombs, it managed to recoup some losses overseas, but it still added up to an infamous dud that was plagued from the start by lukewarm reviews. John Carter might be less affected by gravity on Mars, but here on Earth, he was brought down hard.

The 13th Warrior (1999)

The 13th Warrior is an adaptation of Eaters of the Dead, a novel by Michael Crichton (of Jurassic Park fame) that loosely adapts the myth of Beowulf. While the film earned some recognition for its expensive set pieces, those costly moments ended up ballooning the film's budget to $160 million, not a cheap price tag in 1999. The box office returns were only $61.7 million, leaving the film with a deficit of almost $100 million.
The movie's failure to find an audience is a bit of a puzzler, since the source material was by a proven bestselling writer and it was directed by John McTiernan (director of Die Hard). Maybe it was the late name change from Eaters of the Dead to The 13th Warrior that made audiences suspicious of the film, or maybe it was the fact that Crichton took over partway through and cut anything he didn't like. Whatever the reasons, the end results were so embarrassing that co-star Omar Sharif ended up briefly retiring from acting in disgust.

Mars Needs Moms (2011)

Mars Needs Moms was an experiment in motion-capture performance, co-produced by legendary director Robert Zemeckis and marketed by Disney, a company fairly well-known for its animated movie acumen—all of which is why it's so weird that the movie ended up being equal parts disturbing and entirely toothless. The story follows a 9-year-old trying to save his mom from being murdered by aliens who want to use her "mom-ness" to power their "nannybots," and the film's effects technology (cutting edge at the time) gives an uncomfortable eeriness to every character's facial expressions.
But rather than an exciting adventure or a surreal nightmare of a film, the end result is more boring than anything. Audiences seemed to agree, as the movie only made $39 million out of its $150 million budget—a jaw-dropping loss for a theatrically released animated movie. Mars may need moms, but Earth certainly didn't need this movie.

47 Ronin (2013)

Box office bombs are often the result of a studio betting too highly on a director or concept, letting the budget balloon out of control, and then interfering with the finished product in a vain attempt to recoup their money. 47 Ronin is a perfect example, with a title that evokes the Japanese historical epic of the same name about a group of masterless samurai who make one last stab at redemption.
  • The actual movie shares almost nothing in common with the real-life story, adding in monsters, giants, and a half-Japanese lead played by Keanu Reeves just a few years before his performances in Master of Tai Chi and John Wick would restore his critical standing. The director, Carl Rinsch, was known entirely for his shorts workprior, and the massive budget didn't seem to help the fledgling director acclimate. The movie earned a paltry $38 million domestic to match its $175 million budget; the international box office brought it up to $150 million eventually, but it was still a massive all-around flop—and Rinsch hasn't helmed a feature film since.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WORLDS TOP 10 MOST EXPENSIVE LAPTOPS

     Having a laptop has become a necessity for many people regardless of their needs and their age groups. Laptops are used for many purposes such as working, studying and spending our free time. What makes laptops common among people is that they can be easily carried which allows you to use them at anytime and anyplace wherever it is. Laptops are offered at different prices to suit your budget and satisfy your needs. The more features your laptop offers, the more expensive it will be. In addition to the unique features that are presented by expensive laptops, you can also find unique and precious materials that are included in these laptops such as precious diamonds which make anything look more luxurious. All of these features and more can be found in the top 10 most expensive laptops that are presented to you here. Let’s start our list. 10. Acer Ferrari 1100 – $3,000 ...

World's top 10 most expensive houses

1. Most Expensive House: Buckingham Palace | London, UK Value: $1.55 billion The Queen of England is the queen of real estate. Buckingham Palace is technically a Crown property and comprises 775 rooms, 188 staff rooms, including 52 royal and guest bedrooms, 92 offices, 78 bathrooms, and 19 staterooms making this not just the world's most expensive residence but also the most 'roomy'. 2. Most Expensive House: Antilia | Mumbai, India Value: $1-2 billion Owned by India’s richest man, Mukesh Ambani, the 400,000-square-foot Antilia on Mumbai's Cumballa Hills is situated in one of the world’s most expensive addresses—Altamount Road. Designed by Chicago-based architects Perkins and Will, with the Australian-based construction company Leighton Holdings taking charge of its construction, the building comes with 27 floors, replete with extra-high ceilings. Every floor is equivalent to an average two-storey building's floor. In fact, Antilia ca...

WORLDS TOP 10 MOST EXPENSIVE RINGS

10. Blue Diamond Ring – $10 Million In the list of the most expensive rings of the world, Blue diamond ring comes on 10th number. The ring has a diamond of 6.01 carat. The mentioned blue diamond is in a cushion shape, surrounded by a smaller pink diamond on both the sides. It sold to an anonymous bidder at auction. This ring too sold in Hong Kong and the original expected price was actually within the 2.5-million-dollar range. The fact that this ring sold for three times that amount just goes to show how truly exquisite it is. Vividly-bright light blue stands out, while the pink offsets the striking composition. A platinum band rounds out the triumphant ring, making it one heck of an engagement ring (even if it is just in our dreams.) 9. The Vivid Pink – $11.8 Million The Vivid Pink is on number ninth in the list of the most expensive rings of the world ever made. The 5 carat diamond used in this ring is sure to make anyone who sees it up close and personal very happy. A bi...